Less than a handful of years ago there were close to 200 racial equality
councils (REC's) in the United Kingdom. A recent survey undertaken on behalf of
the East Midlands Racial Equality Consortium by Northamptonshire Rights
and Equality Council has identified only 41 remaining historic racial
equality councils in England, Scotland and Wales with only 33 of them in England. Most organisations
have changed their name to take on the breadth of the equality act
agenda although some remain as racial equality councils. Their
activities still reflect doing one or more of discrimination advice,
immigration advice, hate crime monitoring and good relations/community
cohesion activity. Historic REC's in the devolved nations seem to be
doing well and report good staffing and volunteer numbers. For instance,
Edinburgh and the Lothians Regional Equality Council have 13 staff and SEWREC (South East Wales Racial Equality Council) have 20 staff. The
functioning of REC's which have not gone under is very variable. Some
are just existing with committed volunteers with no paid staff support
at all.
Some areas of the country such as the North East and Cumbria have no historic REC's left.
Is
it that there isn't a need? Is it because there are low BAME population
numbers there? Or is it that the gap has been filled by generalist
equality VCS organisations? There is evidence to show that the need for
REC services
is just acute in areas of low populations numbers. When our REC
provided
racial harassment support in Wellingborough and East Northants, the
numbers of race hate incidents in both areas were often the same despite
a very much larger BAME population in Wellingborough than East
Northants. The indication was that if you lived as a BAME family in East
Northants you were more likely to experience racism that if you live in
the more urban and diverse area of Wellingborough. In Cumbria, the race
disproportionality of stop searches even
attracted the attention of the Equality and Human Rights Commission
blowing apart the myth that racial equality advocates are only needed in
areas where there are high BAME populations .
Could part of the
picture be the erosion of the environments that REC's have
traditionally worked in? Discrimination advice service users now have
the added barrier of tribunal fees of at least £250. This situation has
resulted in an 80% reduction in tribunal applications. That put together
with the imposition of early concilliation by ACAS and the abolution of
the Equality Act questionairre, send a cold, harsh message to
communities facing discrimination and shout loud and clear that the odds
are being stacked against them.
For those REC's working on
issues of hate crime, the austerity agenda has meant massive cuts in
investment in dedicated services like Hate Crime Units are well as other
sources of support such as community safety partnerships and budgets.
The message right across the country is that where in the past there was
an acknowledgement that expertise was required to resolve such issues
quickly and effectively, it is simply unaffordable now.
Immigration
services are also seeing over the last few years the racheting up of
criteria in the baying for blood of those trying to address the
"immigration problem". The introduction of the £18,600 income threshold
to bring over a single dependant relative has meant that migration of
people uniting families is not a trickle but an occasional drip.
In
this kind of operating environment, is it any wonder that REC's
struggle? All the more reason to celebrate and support those that are
still alive.
List of historical racial equality councils still functioning:
London
Barking and Dagenham Racial Equality Council
Ealing Equality Council
Enfield Equality Council
Haringay Race and Equality Council
Harrow Equalities Centre
Hounslow Race and Equalities Council
Kingston Race and Equalities Council
Rights and Equality in Newham
Redbridge Equalities and Communities Council
Sutton Centre for Equalities
Waltham Forest Racial Equality Council
East of England
Cambridge Ethnic Minority Forum
Ipswich and Suffolk Council for Racial Equality
East Midlands
Charnwood Equality and Human Rights
Derby REC
TREC
NREC
North West
Cheshire Halton and Warrington Racial Equality Council
Manchester Community Relations Council
Preston and Western Lancashire Racial Equality Council
South West
The Council for Racial Equality in Cornwall
Plymouth and Devon Racial Equality Council
Wiltshire Racial Equality Council
West Midlands
BRAP
East Staffordshire Rights and Equality Council
Rights and Equality Sandwell
Warwickshire Racial Equality Partnership
South East
Herts Equality Council
Kent Equality and Cohesion Council
Milton Keynes Equality Council
Alliance for Cohesion and Racial Equality
Yorkshire and Humberside
Equality Leeds
York Racial Equality Network
Scotland
Central Scotland Equality Council
Edinburgh and the Lothians Regional Equality Council
Fairness Race Awareness and Equality Fife
Grampian Regional Equality Council
Wales
Rights Equality First
Swansea Bay Regional Equality Council
SEWREC South East Wales Racial Equality Council
The Valleys Regional Equality Council
North East
______
A blog from Anjona Roy, human being and political animal
Showing posts with label Race. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Race. Show all posts
Saturday, 23 August 2014
Friday, 22 June 2012
Talking about immigration doesn’t make you a racist. Being racist makes you a racist.
I talk about immigration much of the time. I’ve just heard a
Labour PPC on the news stating the key reason Labour lost the General election in 2010 was as a result of
perceptions about immigration policy.
Labour lost that election because over a long period of time
they had made a number of wrong judgement calls, had leaders that saw
themselves above the jurisdiction of international law and had back bencher's
and cabinet members who’s egos just couldn’t help themselves from sticking the boot in at totally inopportune moments such as the day before an election.
It’s inconceivable that a political grouping can be in power
for three terms and not make mistakes but quite frankly these aren’t the
apologies that Labour needs to be making.
People in this country are more concerned about whether they
have enough money to pay the bills at the end of the month than anything else.
They are concerns about pay, concerned about job security, concerned about
youth unemployment way above their concern about immigration. It’s only those
on the level of Anders Brevik who still believe that immigration is the reason
for the economic crisis and recession that we find ourselves in. The arguments
people actually want to hear are the arguments which lead to solutions to
economic stability. Further tinkering
with immigration simply will not deliver this. In a month that saw immigration
advice providers deluged by concerned clients desperately trying to get their settlement visa applications in before a July deadline when income thresholds
to bring in spouses rocket from £5,000 to £27,500. This puts the right to
family life for people who choose to marry non-EU migrants well out of the
reach of those on average salaries. The
Con-Dem immigration zealousness has already damaged the stability of British
Universities with the restriction of foreign students, is Labour seriously
wanting to head in this direction.
Have discussion about immigration but look at the human
stories of the impact decision have on peoples ability to enjoy basic human
rights. Look at the impact on economic
recovery and check out that a policy isn’t being implemented that will further
damage a shaky, fragile economy to pander to people who just don’t like a lot of “them”
here. Look at more fundamental solutions
to problems. If school leavers cannot access employment, what is being done to
make them more able and more skilled? Was axing Education Maintenance Allowance
and increasing University fees really that bright an idea?
Labels:
Budget cuts,
election,
Human Rights,
immigration,
Labour Party,
Race
Thursday, 5 February 2009
Northampton- extreme snow, and the need for authorities to lighten up

There were high spirits and a atmosphere of a town where people really cared about each other and wanted to create out of the snow the essence of joy and playfulness. So was it right for the six foot snowball that appeared outside the Grosvenor Centre to be destroyed ?.
With town campaigns increasingly led by the people and not politicians it's concerning when there has been yet another incident when authorities seem to be out of touch with the wishes of local people.
The tenth anniversary of the MacPherson enquiry report being published is coming up in a few week. In the report, ten years ago there was out and out damning condemnation of the police but have things changed now?
Race for a long while has been something that's been too hard to raise as an issue in Northampton with the oh so many problems that are faced locally ... failing schools despite more government investment than anywhere else in the country, a dying town centre, an absence of ambition. Perhaps the key is harnessing the peoples sense of injustice. In that way perhaps race really does need to be on the agenda.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

